#404 True Trueflame edits are not clear

Closed
opened 9 months ago by darkbasic · 1 comments

Issue With Existing Mod

[niko@localhost Textures]$ ls -al
total 8832
drwxr-xr-x. 1 niko niko     866 Jul 29  2010 .
drwxrwxr-x. 1 niko niko      48 Sep 19 10:49 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  349712 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_blade.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  349712 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_blade_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  349712 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_blade_rust.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  349712 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_blade_rust_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_grip.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_grip_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_grip_rust.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_grip_rust_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_habaki.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_habaki_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_habaki_rust.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko  174928 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_habaki_rust_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_hilt.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_hilt_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_hilt_rust.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_hilt_rust_nm.dds
-rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko   87536 Jul 30  2010 pl_trueflame_refl.dds

What should we do with pl_trueflame_refl.dds? Should we rename it to pl_trueflame_spec.dds? Or make multiple copies like:

pl_trueflame_blade_spec.dds
pl_trueflame_blade_rust_spec.dds
pl_trueflame_grip_spec.dds
pl_trueflame_grip_rust_spec.dds
pl_trueflame_habaki_spec.dds
pl_trueflame_habaki_rust_spec.dds
pl_trueflame_hilt_spec.dds
pl_trueflame_hilt_rust_spec.dds

Do we need to remove the NiTextureEffect entry with Nifskope as well?

### Issue With Existing Mod * Mod name or URL: https://modding-openmw.com/mods/steps/?step=95 * Describe the issue in detail: ``` [niko@localhost Textures]$ ls -al total 8832 drwxr-xr-x. 1 niko niko 866 Jul 29 2010 . drwxrwxr-x. 1 niko niko 48 Sep 19 10:49 .. -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 349712 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_blade.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 349712 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_blade_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 349712 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_blade_rust.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 349712 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_blade_rust_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_grip.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_grip_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_grip_rust.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_grip_rust_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_habaki.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_habaki_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_habaki_rust.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 174928 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_habaki_rust_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_hilt.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_hilt_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_hilt_rust.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 1398256 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_hilt_rust_nm.dds -rw-r--r--. 1 niko niko 87536 Jul 30 2010 pl_trueflame_refl.dds ``` What should we do with `pl_trueflame_refl.dds`? Should we rename it to `pl_trueflame_spec.dds`? Or make multiple copies like: ``` pl_trueflame_blade_spec.dds pl_trueflame_blade_rust_spec.dds pl_trueflame_grip_spec.dds pl_trueflame_grip_rust_spec.dds pl_trueflame_habaki_spec.dds pl_trueflame_habaki_rust_spec.dds pl_trueflame_hilt_spec.dds pl_trueflame_hilt_rust_spec.dds ``` Do we need to remove the NiTextureEffect entry with Nifskope as well?
hristoast self-assigned this 9 months ago
hristoast added the
DB/Mod edit
label 9 months ago
hristoast added the
UX/Text
label 9 months ago
hristoast added this to the Release: 3.0 milestone 6 months ago
hristoast commented 6 months ago
Owner

Fixed by 0c1f32a9df

I compared the sha256sum of my meshes versus ones straight from the archive and they match, so no mesh edit is needed.

Fixed by https://git.modding-openmw.com/Modding-OpenMW.com/momw/commit/0c1f32a9dfec4fb6e5f0a4ea3ba87fc3987772f6 I compared the sha256sum of my meshes versus ones straight from the archive and they match, so no mesh edit is needed.
hristoast closed this issue 6 months ago
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
There is no content yet.